When Truth Is Silenced: How Procedural Abuse Destroys Lives in Canada’s Courts
My Experience in CV-23-0000-1801-0000 — and Why Canada Must Confront Legal Misconduct.
There are moments in life when truth itself seems to stand trial.
For me, that moment came inside a courtroom under the case number CV-23-0000-1801-0000, where every word I spoke in defense of myself — a self-represented Pakistani-Muslim business owner — was met with disbelief, dismissal, and, at times, open hostility.
This is not merely a story about one litigant’s pain. It is a story about how Canada’s legal system can fail the very people it claims to protect when the rules of fairness are twisted by power, influence, and silence.
The Core of the Case
The matter arose from events involving Dr. Sabina Parimoo, and later the involvement of McCarthy LLP, lawyer Chris Puskas, and counsel Peter Gordon Leigh.
According to documents, transcripts, and police records in my possession, a police complaint was filed against me that I firmly believe was unfounded and malicious.
From the outset, the process that followed displayed disturbing irregularities — communications that were never disclosed, hearings held without proper notice, and legal claims pursued with no factual basis.
I maintain that this sequence of actions amounted to procedural abuse, and that the justice system’s failure to detect or correct it has inflicted irreversible harm on my life and reputation.
The evidence in my hands — including official police documents, sworn affidavits, email correspondence, and hearing transcripts — demonstrates serious inconsistencies between what was alleged and what actually occurred.
These materials, now part of the public record, raise legitimate questions about:
The role of counsel in advancing claims without evidentiary foundation;
The lack of judicial safeguards against bad-faith litigation; and
The unequal treatment of self-represented individuals in our courts.
My purpose here is not vengeance — it is accountability. Canadians deserve to know when the system designed to deliver justice instead enables harm.
The emotional toll of being falsely portrayed, financially burdened, and publicly humiliated cannot be measured.
There were days when I felt that the weight of injustice might take my life.
I share this now not for sympathy, but for every person who has stood alone before a court believing that truth would prevail — and discovered it can be silenced by procedure.
No one should lose their livelihood, mental health, or dignity because powerful actors manipulate process over substance.
This article is not an attack. It is a public call for reform.
We need transparency in how lawyers and institutions conduct themselves when representing powerful clients.
We need accountability for misuse of process.
And we need compassion for those navigating the system without wealth or legal representation — especially when they come from marginalized communities.
If Canada wishes to remain a country of justice, it must ensure that truth cannot be buried under privilege.
This article reflects my personal experience, opinions, and interpretation of evidence filed in CV-23-0000-1801-0000 before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.
All references are based on materials contained in the public record and documentary evidence in my possession.
This publication is made in good faith and in the public interest, to promote transparency, accountability, and fairness within the Canadian justice system.
